spotenterprise.blogg.se

Devonthink pro 3 vs devonthink pro office
Devonthink pro 3 vs devonthink pro office







The most important reason people chose Logseq is: Logseq is opensource. In the question What are the best knowledge base systems for personal use Logseq is ranked 2nd while DEVONthink is ranked 20th. That's when you'd almost certainly need Hazel with DevonThink's Automator rules (if you have DevonThink and have installed its "Extras", open up Automator and they should already be there), or Hazel with Applescripts (there is one set of such scripts further down the thread I referred to above), or, in the final analysis, DevonThink's promised "actions". 31 9 92 6 When comparing DEVONthink vs Logseq, the Slant community recommends Logseq for most people. The highest layer of complexity would involve Hazel placing the tagged files not in the databases' Inbox folders, but in named folders, or "groups" as DT calls them, within the databases.

devonthink pro 3 vs devonthink pro office devonthink pro 3 vs devonthink pro office

There may be simpler ways (probably involving scripting: there are AppleScripts for selecting particular DT databases elsewhere on the Web). As you can see, the system of folders quickly becomes quite complex. Moving up the tree of complexity, with more than one DT database, what I'd do is to pair each database with a newly created Hazel-monitored folder to carry out the tagging as above, with a single separate Hazel-monitored Inbox folder with Hazel rules to parcel out incoming files to the database-paired folders as appropriate. In a slightly more complex case, where some files may contain no text and need OCR-ing, something like steps 1 and 2 of this procedure could be used to OCR the files first (so that Hazel could search their content and apply tags accordingly).

Devonthink pro 3 vs devonthink pro office license key#

A series of Hazel rules could be created in order to tag files placed in the folder depending on their content, and then move or copy them into the Inbox of the DT database, or into folder(s) outside DT but indexed by DT. Home VST VST Plugins Subscribe Home DEVONthink Pro Crack DEVONthink Pro Crack DEVONthink Pro 3.8.4 Crack Mac Full License Key Latest 2023 4 min read VST Plugins Windows DEVONthink Pro 3.8.4 Crack Mac Full License Key Latest 2023 vdadmn JanuDEVONthink Pro 3.8. In the simplest case, with one DT database and files that already contain text, a folder could be created outside DevonThink that is monitored by Hazel. So Hazel could be used to tag files with "Finder" tags externally before they are imported into, or indexed by, DevonThink the tags would carry over. DevonThink is capable of transforming "Finder" tags into the tags that it uses internally. Hazel could still play a role, acting outside DT's databases. But the promised DT "actions" won't necessarily provide the only way to respond to the OP's wish for automation to be used to tag files for DevonThink. And Hazel can't effectively, currently, "see" into DT's databases. However, it sounds as if Hazel is unlikely to be involved in those "actions". But, as my up-to-date copy of DevonThink Pro Office is Version 2.9.11, if I had to guess I'd say that the "actions" promised in Christian Grunenberg's answers to me are likely to arrive at some point in Version 3.x - in other words, relatively soon (although I've seen no sign yet of betas being tested).

devonthink pro 3 vs devonthink pro office

I'm the "Hugh" who asked the question referenced by Allsop above.







Devonthink pro 3 vs devonthink pro office